CHAP. 79. (77.)—OF THE MODE IN WHICH THE DAYS ARE
COMPUTED.
The days have been computed by different people in different ways.
The Babylonians reckoned from one sunrise
to the next; the Athenians from one sunset to the next; the
Umbrians from noon to noon; the multitude, universally,
from light to darkness; the Roman priests and those who
presided over the civil day, also the Egyptians and Hipparchus, from
midnight to midnight[1]. It appears that the interval from one sunrise
to the next is less near the solstices
than near the equinoxes, because the position of the zodiac
is more oblique about its middle part, and more straight
near the solstice[2].
1. A. Gellius, iii. 3, informs us, that the question concerning the
commencement of the day was one of the topics discussed by Varro, in
his
book "Rerum Humanarum:" this work is lost. We learn from the
notes of Hardouin, Lemaire, i. 399, that there are certain countries in
which all these various modes of computation are still practised; the
last-mentioned is the one commonly employed in Europe.
2. It has been supposed, that in this passage the author intended to
say no more than that the nights are shorter at the summer solstice than
at the other parts of the year; see Alexandre in Lemaire, i. 399, 400.
But to this, I conceive, it may be objected, that the words "inter ortus
solis" can scarcely apply to the period while the sun is below the horizon,
and that the solstices generally would seem to be opposed to the equinoxes
generally. Also the words "obliquior" and "rectior" would appear to
have some farther reference than merely to the length of time during
which the sun is above or below the horizon.